Why News Ltd is amazing

This op-ed by James Morrow in the Telegraph today pretty much gets the whole BDS issue in a short tabloid article. While that may be a good thing in and of itself, the best is that both in the paper and on the website, they put a big picture of Israeli model Bar Rafaeli next to the article – meaning anyone perusing the site/paper will almost definitely click the link or read the piece, just to see what she looks like.

Good work the Telegraph!

 

 

North Korea, Iran, Burma… Marrickville | The Daily Telegraph.

WHAT does the desert theocracy of Saudi Arabia have in common with Marrickville Council in Sydney’s inner west?

Ever since a Marrickville Council meeting late last year, both are sworn enemies of Israel. In a 10-2 vote, the council decided that it would “boycott all goods made in Israel and any sporting, academic institutions, government or institutional cultural exchanges”. Trendy councils supporting trendy causes is nothing new.

Greens-dominated Marrickville is a nuclear-free zone that abhors Australia’s treatment of refugees while taking a “BANANA” approach to development: Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone.

But by boycotting Israel, Marrickville Council is taking its UN routine a step too far. The first problem is what the boycott would mean in practice.

Israel is one of the most innovative and entrepreneurial countries in the world. Its products and inventions find their way into computers, mobile phones, and medicines.

A ban means a lot more than just making sure the hummus at council meetings is non-kosher. The second problem is that the move cuts against the proper business of a council and demonstrates that the supposed progressivism of the district only goes so far.

Fatah, and indeed most of that part of the world with the exception of Israel, is not exactly committed to those values Greens share with normal people, including the right of women to dress how they choose and of homosexuals not to be executed.

And unlike Marrickville, which just wants to boycott Israel, Fatah is committed to its elimination

This isn’t the first time Marrickville has taken such a stance. Last year when a local shopkeeper painted an anti-burqa mural on his own wall, Marrickville Council finally found a piece of “street art” it didn’t like.

Councillor Sam Iskandar, thought to be the driving force behind the Israel boycott, said the mural “goes against the values” of the Marrickville community and tried to get it removed.

Presumably those with strong opinions on any issue of the day are encouraged to cross Parramatta Rd to Leichhardt and hash it out in a cafe where they won’t offend anyone.

Better yet, Marrickville councillors and frustrated local foreign ministers everywhere should realise what the values of serving in local government are all about. Improving amenities. Picking up the trash. Scrubbing graffiti.

And leaving the diplomacy to Canberra.

Advertisements

, , , , , ,

  1. #1 by Liam on January 12, 2011 - 10:47 pm

    “Fatah is committed to [Israel’s] elimination.”

    Come on, MK…

    • #2 by MK on January 12, 2011 - 11:07 pm

      Hey, no one said it was perfect.

      • #3 by Liam on January 13, 2011 - 12:47 pm

        It’s so far from it, one could even come close to saying it’s as extreme and rejectionist as the pro-BDS’ers. Could.

        Neither are willing to accept their own side’s faults, both see the other as too far gone rejectionist/eliminationist, and both resort to petty rhetoric instead of tachlis ideas to fix the problem.

        Poor form from both.

  2. #4 by MK on January 13, 2011 - 1:36 pm

    That’s not true at all, there’s a lot of basis for saying that Fatah is committed to Israel’s elimination. Their TV shows for kids refer to Tel-Aviv as “occupied Palestine”; the maps in textbooks do not show Israel’s existence; they name schools, town squares and sports fields after “martyrs” – i.e. terrorists who killed Israeli civilians; they technically want to relocate every descendant of the Palestinians who lived in what is now Israel before 1947 back to Israel, which would effectively eliminate Israel.

    On the other hand, Arafat recognised Israel in a private letter to Rabin in 1993 and most top Fatah leaders say they are committed to a two-state solution, at least when speaking in English. And there’s also the self-fulfilling prophecy argument, which I’m sure you were about to get to.

    And come to think of it, I’m sure someone on the other side would be telling me how Israel says it’s pro-peace while it expands settlements, increases incursions into Palestinian territory etc. etc. But that kind of thing is not on the same level. Plus the BDS movement is one-state-solutionist, whereas Morrow is just attacking an organisation who he thinks are not trustworthy partners. I don’t think it’s fair to equate the two, he may not be correct, but he’s less wrong.

  1. So Fatah is not necessarily “committed to Israel’s elimination” « Major Karnage

Have any thoughts on this? Put them here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: